The National Academies’ Committee on Science, Technology, and Law seeks $10,000 from the Hewlett Foundation to support travel of experts and other related expenses for a June 2012 meeting to discuss the feasibility of a professional school course on science, law, and policy. This meeting is a follow-on from a January 2012 meeting co-chaired by Dr. Bruce Alberts and Mr. Paul Brest. NAS posits that graduates of professional schools (e.g., in law, public policy, and business) require scientific and technical knowledge to support their decision-making, but that most of these graduates lack a fundamental understanding of the methods, social and intellectual practices, goals, achievements, and/or limitations of the sciences. The June 2012 meeting is intended to help plan for the development of this curriculum by: a) Developing a mission statement/report on the importance of the problem of scientific literacy in decision-making and the justification for the initial focus on professional schools; b) Generating ideas about case studies that could demonstrate the importance of improving understanding of "scientific reality" in a variety of decision-making settings: legislative, regulatory, litigation, standard-setting and business; c) Considering development of a curated web-site to house existing materials, new materials, and possibly host forums for debates on emerging problems. Following the June 2012 meeting, staff will work with the co-chairs to develop a project plan and strategy.
About the Grantee
500 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC, 20001-2736, United States
Grants to this Grantee
for a project researching social media effects on adolescents and children
Since 2016, the research on the health effects of social media on adolescents and children has evolved. A number of studies suggest there is little or no association between social media usage and mental and physical health problems, while other studies indicate a link. The National Academies provides independent, objective advice to the nation on matters related to science and technology. This grant will support a committee of the National Academies to examine the current research and make conclusions about the impact of social media on the mental and physical health and well-being of adolescents and children. The committee will make recommendations for future research, as well as steps that parents, social media companies, and public officials can take to maximize potential benefits and minimize potential harms of social media for adolescents and children.
for the Roundtable on Macroeconomics and Climate-related Risks and Opportunities
Established in 1863 by an act of Congress, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine provides independent, objective analysis and advice to the nation and conducts other activities to solve complex problems and inform public policy decisions. Members are elected by their peers for outstanding contributions to research. This grant supports the establishment of a Roundtable on Macroeconomics and Climate-related Risks and Opportunities by the National Academies, with a goal of improving understanding of how the physical and transition effects of climate change relate to and affect macroeconomic performance and the implications for fiscal, monetary, and financial stability policies. The Roundtable will be a venue for federal agencies and cross-disciplinary experts in academia, industry, and nongovernmental organizations to discuss challenges associated with incorporating climate change risks and opportunities into macroeconomic analysis.
for a Committee on National Statistics panel
The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine provide independent scientific advice to the government. Its Committee on National Statistics will convene an expert panel on an integrated system of household income, consumption, and wealth statistics, currently produced by multiple agencies. Available series are conceptually inconsistent and insufficiently accurate, timely, or detailed (geographically or demographically) for policy or research. Series differ as to the extent of inequality and other measures of households’ economic well-being, clouding policy debates and public understanding. The panel’s report will recommend steps toward an integrated system that can better illuminate households’ economic circumstances, as well as inequities in their ability to achieve an adequate standard of living and provide education and homeownership opportunities for their children.